pinkeye wrote:oh.. good grief.
For a START ,, it is a Bill.
And I think it is pretty obvious that you cannot seek to moderate abortion, if you ignore all the things that go with this proposal. How would it work otherwise,> ??
It wouldn't work. In order to "moderate abortion" it does need to have all the things that go with this proposal. HOWEVER, why wasn't it promoted as a bill which "moderates abortion" instead of a bill that simply removes abortion from the Crimes Act? I've answered this, so now you answer my question, if you're capable of doing so.
A one line sentence will not cut it . NO LAW can be as simple as you seem to expect, especially when it comes to something as critical as this.
Correct, which is why it was so deceptive to promote it as something so simple as to just remove abortion from the Crimes Act.
Are you saying this Bill is ineffective.?
No, it's VERY effective at making abortion easier to get.
How would YOU phrase them in terms which would be subjected to parliamentary scrutiny,.
How would I phrase what?
HOW would YOU prefer it.?
OR perhaps you don't want it AT ALL.
Yes, I would certainly prefer that babies were never killed for cases where the mothers life isn't in danger.